World Athletics has introduced stringent new regulations to safeguard female athletes, implementing cheek swabbing to verify an athlete’s biological sex. This decision underscores the global organization’s commitment to preserving the integrity of women’s sports, particularly amid increasing political pressure.
Contents
- 1 World Athletics Prioritizes Fairness in Female Sports
- 2 Athletes and Advocates Applaud the Decision
- 3 Political Influence and Regulatory Backing
- 4 Controversies Surrounding Transgender Athletes in Competitive Sports
- 5 Scientific Backing and Implementation of Gender Verification
- 6 Legal and Ethical Considerations
- 7 Future Implications for Female Athletics
World Athletics Prioritizes Fairness in Female Sports
Sebastian Coe, President of World Athletics, emphasized that these measures reinforce the organization’s stance on protecting the female category. He asserted that ensuring fair competition in women’s sports remains a top priority. Although no official timeline has been announced, reports indicate that pre-clearance testing is expected to be implemented before the upcoming World Championships in Tokyo this September.

Coe emphasized that this measure is essential to upholding the fairness and integrity of women’s athletics. Our goal is not just to discuss fairness but to guarantee it.”
Athletes and Advocates Applaud the Decision
Former Olympic swimmer Sharron Davies MBE, a strong advocate against transgender inclusion in female categories, welcomed the decision. She expressed her support on social media, calling for issuing medals to female athletes who were “unfairly robbed” in past competitions.
“No more males competing in a category meant for females. Medals should be reissued to those who lost due to unfair competition,” Davies wrote on social platform X.
Political Influence and Regulatory Backing
This development follows months of advocacy from U.S. President Donald Trump, who signed an executive order blocking transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Education, led by former WWE executive Linda McMahon, has urged sports associations to nullify awards and records previously held by transgender women.

Controversies Surrounding Transgender Athletes in Competitive Sports
The debate over transgender participation in women’s sports has sparked significant controversy across different sports. Earlier this year, a female college volleyball team forfeited matches against San Jose State due to the presence of transgender player Blaire Fleming on the opposing roster.
Wyoming athlete Macey Boggs voiced her concerns: “I was denied my final collegiate matches due to an unfair situation. We competed against a male athlete on a woman’s scholarship or forfeited our season.”

Similarly, the basketball community has faced heated disputes. In January, Vancouver Island University’s transgender player Harriette Mackenzie, who led the team in points, rebounds, and blocks, refused to compete against Columbia Bible College. Mackenzie alleged that the opposing coach encouraged rough play against her, further intensifying the controversy.
Scientific Backing and Implementation of Gender Verification
World Athletics conducted extensive consultations on its cheek swab proposal earlier this year, receiving widespread support. The testing will analyze the SRY gene, typically found on the Y chromosome, to determine an athlete’s biological sex. Additional testosterone level evaluations may be conducted if necessary.
Scientific findings indicate that testosterone suppression in transgender and DSD (differences of sexual development) athletes does not eliminate the male performance advantage. Moreover, research highlights that the performance gap between biological males and females exists even before puberty, particularly in athletics disciplines such as running, throwing, and jumping.

Legal and Ethical Considerations
Despite potential legal challenges, Coe remains confident in the policy’s validity. “We have consistently defended our DSD regulations in the Court of Arbitration for Sport, where they have been upheld on multiple occasions.” We will continue to safeguard the female category,” he affirmed.
Future Implications for Female Athletics
These recommendations are approved shortly after Coe’s unsuccessful bid to become the International Olympic Committee (IOC) president. His campaign strongly emphasized protecting female sports categories, though he secured only eight out of 97 votes, losing to Zimbabwe’s Kirsty Coventry.
With World Athletics implementing these new measures, the global sporting community anticipates further debates on gender identity in athletics. These policies aim to establish a level playing field, ensuring female athletes compete under fair and equitable conditions.


